Common Issues

Georgia Tech's status as a state university imposes certain restrictions on its contracting activities that a private university or company does not face. Many standard clauses typically found in commercial contracts can not be accepted by Georgia Tech. The restrictions are based on constitutional and statutory prohibitions. Contract issues also may arise from Georgia Tech in the performance of sponsored research through GTRC. Although GTRC is not a state agency, as a Cooperative Organization of Georgia Tech, it is GTRC's policy not to accept contract terms that Georgia Tech is prohibited from accepting, since obligations under GTRC research contracts are passed through to Georgia Tech.

Common Prohibited Contractual Provisions

1. Indemnification and/or hold harmless - Any provision that requires Georgia Tech to pay all losses another party may incur. State agencies are prohibited from agreeing to indemnify third parties. Indemnification provisions have been determined to violate the prohibition against pledges of the State's credit and the prohibition against gratuities by the State (Ga. Const. Art. VII, Sec. IV, Par. VIII; Ga. Const. Art. III. Sec. VI, Par. VI; 1980 Op. Att'y Gen. 80-67; Op. Att'y Gen. 74-115. Indemnification provisions have also been determined to be invalid as unauthorized attempts to contractually waive the State's sovereign immunity 1980 Op. Att'y Gen. 80-67.

The first constitutional provision provides that the credit of the State shall not be pledged or loaned to any individual, company or association. Debt as used in the constitution is defined in terms of an annual budget cycle that relies on annual appropriations of the legislature. Under this definition, a "pledge" would include agreeing to obligations of funds beyond the current fiscal year. The second constitutional provision relates to the "gratuities clause" which prohibits state entities from granting any donation or gratuity (gift) to a third party or forgiving any debt or obligation owed to the public. The gratuities clause essentially requires that the state entity receive a substantial benefit for the grant or use of its assets (whether using property or personnel). Finally, by virtue of the doctrine of sovereign immunity, suit may not be maintained in the courts against a state entity without the express consent of the State.

Patent and Copyright Indemnification - The Attorney General has taken the position that it is the sole legal advisor for the state and state entities may not agree to be represented by third parties, even when the matter involves the third party defending its patent rights.

2.Warranty/Guarantee - Any provision that unconditionally assures or promises a certain result or outcome, including such terms as acceptance testing. The Attorney General has advised that warranty provisions violate the prohibition against pledges of the State's credit and the prohibition against gratuities by the State. The reason is that resources may have to be expended to satisfy such warranty or guarantee.

3. Governing law of or venue in any state other than Georgia. Contracts with state entities must be governed by the laws of the State of Georgia. State law provides that the Attorney General has exclusive authority and control over all matters of litigation or potential litigation involving State agencies. As a result, Georgia Tech does not have statutory authority to accept the governing laws of another state. There is also a practical aspect to this position: the Attorney General's staff does not want to agree to obey laws for which they are unfamiliar.

4. Requirements that Georgia Tech pay taxes, interest, liquidated damages, penalty fees or cancellation charges, litigation costs, or attorney's fees.

ATTORNEY'S FEES/COSTS. We do not agree to pay these costs. The rationale is that such a payment would be a violation of the constitutional gratuities clause.

DAMAGES. Damage clauses that are limited to consequential damages or special damages are generally acceptable since they are so ill-defined and speculative that most courts refuse to award them (i.e., lost profits). However, adding indirect or incidental as additional types of damages payable by Georgia Tech is not acceptable. The UCC regards these as distinguishable from consequential damages because they are usually meant to include out of pocket expenses directly attributable to the breach (i.e., travel expenses).

INTEREST. With the exception of the Standard MULTI-YEAR Agreement (which is an installment purchase agreement), Georgia Tech will not agree to pay interest. The Attorney General has advised us that payment of interest would be prohibited by the gratuities clause of the constitution and that Georgia Tech lacks statutory authority to agree to the payment of interest. Atty. Gen. Position Paper dated August 8, 1978; Bently v. State Board of Examiners, 152 Ga. 836 (1922).

LATE PAYMENT/CANCELLATION CHARGES. GIT does not agree to pay late payment charges. This policy stems from an opinion of the Attorney General that late payment charges are in the nature of penalty/gratuity which the State is constitutionally prohibited from paying.

TAXES. The State is exempt from most taxes and generally will not agree to contract language which requires the payment of taxes. We will not agree to reimburse the vendor for the payment of taxes. We will agree to language that says "GIT will pay taxes lawfully imposed upon it".

5. Binding arbitration. Georgia Tech does not agree to binding arbitration. The rationale is that there is no specific statutory authority allowing us to do so. Attorney General has exclusive authority and control over all matters of litigation or potential litigation involving State agencies, thus Georgia Tech has no authority to limit the type or scope of judicial action, or the result obtainable therefrom by the State. Provisions which effectively waive the right of the Attorney General to bring actions on behalf of the state are prohibited.

6.Restrictions on publication that prevent publication or delay publication for an unreasonable amount of time. As non-profit educational institutions, Georgia Tech and its cooperative research foundation, the Georgia Tech Research Corporation, are subject to the provisions of the Bayh Dole Act and Internal Revenue Procedure 97-14, Guidelines for Research Agreements, which require that we ensure new intellectual property is made available for public use. An agreement not to publish may impact Georgia Tech and GTRC in a variety of ways. It may cause the research to be considered commercial research, thereby affecting tax-exempt status of the organization, the tax exempt status of bonds used to fund a facility, the use of facilities may be considered a private business and/or may cause the institute to lose an exemption under export regulations where the sponsor is a foreign entity. We may agree to reasonable delays that are needed to preserve potential patent rights. In addition, in contracts with foreign entities, the failure to publish may affect Georgia Tech's ability to rely on the public domain and fundamental research exceptions in the export laws and regulations.

7. Any provision requiring Georgia Tech to be bound by terms and conditions that are unknown at the time of signing the agreement. Unknown obligations may violate various laws such as the prohibition against pledges of the State's credit and the prohibition against gratuities by the State. As a practical matter, entering into contracts that call for an unspecified sum of money to change hands make it extremely difficult to budget. Such provisions in a contract would be void as a matter of law, and should be avoided at the time the contract is entered.

8. Requirements that provide for endorsement or marketing of a private entity by Georgia Tech. The mission of Georgia Tech is to contribute to the fulfillment of the scientific and technical needs of the State of Georgia through education, research and service. Endorsing a particular entity's product may be counter to the mission. The faculty must be free to reach independent conclusions and publish opinions which are free from corporate influence.

9. Any provision requiring exclusivity in a contractual arrangement that was not competitively bid. Certain sponsored research agreements, such as teaming agreements may have limited exclusivity provisions, provided that exclusivity is restricted to the lowest possible level (i.e., Project Director, Lab, School, etc.). State agencies must comply with the competitive bidding/purchasing statutes and the Georgia Vendor's Manual with regard to items that must be purchased by competitive bidding vs. sole source. For more information, review the Georgia Tech Purchasing Department's web site or contact a Purchasing Officer for more information regarding specific requirements.

10. Multi-year terms or automatic renewals for agreements obligating state appropriated funds are prohibited. All contracts must expire at the end of the fiscal year (July 1 - June 30). (O.C.G.A. Sec. 50-5-64; Attorney General Op. 74-115). 

Contracts may not allow for automatic renewals when state funds are/would be obligated in subsequent fiscal years. Atty. Gen. Op. 74-115. Contracts may be renewed at the sole discretion of GIT and require that GIT take an affirmative action to renew. The AG ruled that the contract may be renewed prior to the end of the fiscal year if all of the funds are available and are unencumbered during that same fiscal year. Atty. Gen. Op. 80-163.

11. Best efforts provisions that require the expenditure of any funds or efforts necessary to meet the obligations of a contract, even if such efforts exceed the dollar amount of the contract. Best efforts provisions have been held to be warranties and/or guarantees. Such provisions violate the prohibition against pledging the State's credit. (Refer to discussion of warranties above for more information).

12. Contractual provisions that require Georgia Tech to waive potential claims against a third party or otherwise limit the liability of such party. GIT does not have the authority to prejudice the rights of the State to sue or otherwise enforce a contract by agreeing to a limit on or a waiver of liability. (Refer to discussion of arbitration, above, for more information).

13. Contractual provisions which require Georgia Tech to accept the risk of loss of an item during delivery.Generally we want delivery F.O.B. Georgia Tech's facility so that the risk of loss is on the seller until such delivery. As a rule, we do not accept risk of loss until title actually passes to Georgia Tech because we have no way to cover the item under the state self-insurance policy.

14. If the agreement is a result of an ITB or an RFP, we do not allow vendors to disclaim warranties. The rationale is that a purchase resulting from a competitive process should provide for specific products or services to be provided to us to fit a particular need/purpose. To allow a vendor to disclaim a warranty of fitness in such a case would defeat the competitive process.

15. Contractual clauses that require Georgia Tech to purchase insurance policies or provide coverage for third parties. Georgia Tech, as a state agency, does not have authority to purchase commercial insurance. State law provides for the Department of Administrative Services to procure insurance for State entities. Georgia Tech is covered by the Tort Claims Act and the State of Georgia General Liability Agreement administered by the Department of Administrative Services.

16. Provisions that prohibit a contractor's employee from accepting a position with Georgia Tech or provisions which require Georgia Tech to comply with contractor regulations (including union rules). The State of Georgia is a right to work state which allows individuals to refuse to participate in labor organizations or refrain from certain affiliations. (O.C.G.A. Sec. 34-6-21). This also means that the State will not prohibit anyone from applying for a job with any State Agency.